Welcome to International Journal of Geriatric Orthopedics (IJGO)

Contact Us

Comprehensive Guidelines for Publishing in GOSI Journals

Comprehensive Guidelines for Publishing in GOSI Journals

Dr. SS Amarnath

Publishing in an esteemed academic journal requires careful preparation, adherence to ethical standards, and a strong awareness of the publication process. This document provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting to GOSI journals, structured into three major sections: (1) Before You Submit, (2) The Publication Process, and (3) After Publication. Each section outlines best practices, key considerations, and practical recommendations to support authors in maximizing the success and impact of their scholarly work.

Section 1: Before You Submit

The preparation phase is critical to the overall success of your manuscript. Authors should take time to ensure that their research is presented with clarity, relevance, and in full alignment with the aims of the intended journal.

1.1 Rationale for Publishing

Academic publication advances disciplinary knowledge, supports professional growth, and validates research. Authors should ask themselves:

  • What gap does my research fill?

  • How does it contribute to existing theory or practice?

  • Who will benefit from these findings?

  • Is the research novel, innovative, or corrective of existing assumptions?

1.2 Assessing the Risk of Submission

High-risk manuscripts often include content outside the journal’s scope, improper formatting, excessive length, or material already published. Low-risk submissions are carefully aligned with the journal’s subject area, integrate recent debates, and cite relevant works from the same outlet or comparable venues.

1.3 Selecting an Appropriate Journal

Authors should investigate:

  • The journal’s stated aims and scope

  • The type of articles typically accepted (an author is allowed to submit only one article per journal)

  • Editorial board expertise and reputation

  • Impact metrics and indexing (e.g., Scopus, Web of Science)

  • Acceptance rates and publication timelines

  • Institutional restrictions or funding agreements on journals

  • Readership: Will the journal’s audience value the work?

1.4 Identifying and Avoiding Predatory Journals

Predatory publishers exploit the open access system by charging authors fees without providing legitimate peer review. Warning signs include fabricated editorial boards, lack of transparency, suspiciously rapid acceptance, or websites imitating established journals. Authors should verify inclusion in recognized indexes, confirm editorial board legitimacy, and review publisher policies.

1.5 Preparing the Manuscript

A well-prepared manuscript demonstrates professionalism and increases the likelihood of acceptance. Essential elements include:

  • Accurate adherence to formatting and referencing guidelines

  • Concise title, informative abstract, and carefully chosen keywords

  • Logical structure: introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion

  • Ethical disclosures: funding, conflicts of interest, and approval statements

  • High-quality tables and figures with proper captions and permissions

  • Complete proofreading for grammar, clarity, and style

1.6 Manuscript Preparation Checklist

  • Checklist Item
  • Correct referencing style (APA, Harvard, etc.)
  • Adherence to word count
  • Proper formatting of figures and tables
  • Manuscript anonymized (if double-blind review)
  • Clear statement of purpose in introduction
  • Ethics approval and disclosures included
  • Proofreading completed
  • Cover letter prepared
  • AI usage disclosed (if applicable)

Section 2: The Publication Process

Understanding the pathway of submission and peer review prepares authors for the outcomes they may encounter. This section outlines the journey from initial submission to final decision.

2.1 Initial Editorial Screening

Following submission, manuscripts undergo preliminary evaluation by editors. At this stage, papers may be desk-rejected due to scope misalignment, weak methodology, or poor presentation.

2.2 Possible Editorial Outcomes

The potential decisions include:

  • Desk Reject – unsuitable for the journal

  • Reject and Resubmit – major flaws requiring new submission

  • Revise and Resubmit – extensive changes requested

  • Major Revision – substantial revisions required

  • Minor Revision – small improvements needed

  • Acceptance – rare without revision

2.3 Responding to Reviewer Feedback

Authors should prepare a response document mapping each reviewer comment to corresponding changes. If a suggestion cannot be incorporated, provide a reasoned justification. Maintain a respectful and professional tone throughout.

2.4 Learning from Rejections

Rejection should not be viewed as failure. Instead, use reviewers’ comments to refine the manuscript. Consider alternative journals with closer scope alignment.

2.5 Peer Review and Acceptance

Accepted manuscripts proceed to production, which includes copyediting, typesetting, and proof generation. Authors are responsible for reviewing proofs promptly and confirming final corrections.

2.6 Open Access and APCs

If publishing in open access format, authors may be required to pay an article processing charge (APC). Funding support may be available through institutional agreements, grants, or waivers. Authors should confirm available options early in the process.

Section 3: After Publication

The impact of research extends beyond publication. Authors should actively promote and disseminate their work to maximize visibility and engagement.

3.1 Promoting Your Publication

Strategies include presenting at conferences, sharing with professional networks, and engaging with scholarly communities. Authors should not hesitate to advocate for their own research.

3.2 Translating Research into Policy and Practice

To influence policy or practice, research must be communicated in accessible formats. Policy briefs, public engagement, and collaboration with stakeholders can extend the influence of published work.

3.3 Enhancing Discoverability

Effective use of keywords, abstracts, and titles improves visibility through search engines. Authors should also deposit their work in institutional repositories where permissible.

3.4 Supplementary Promotional Tools

Consider plain-language summaries, infographics, video abstracts, or blog posts. These resources appeal to broader audiences and enhance impact metrics.

3.5 Leveraging Social Media

Social platforms such as LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), and research-focused forums enable rapid dissemination. Posts should be professional, concise, and linked to the article.

3.6 Building Research Networks

Engaging with online communities and professional associations fosters collaboration and increases visibility. Participation in academic dialogues further elevates the profile of the author’s work.

Message from GOSI

Hi Folks,

Being in GOSI for the last 11 years, it’s a journey to remember in elderly care related to bone & joint issues in those silver line years. It’s always been our endeavour to bring out the journal exclusively addressing the geriatric orthopedic musculoskeletal issues, highlighting the present mode of treatment & management of the above conditions, plus also to include the advancements in the medical science & technology that’s fast evolving and assisting the elderly care, which needs to be in journal format for the present & the future generations to follow & refer in an inclusive way.

I’m really proud to bring our first GOSI journal, which has been curated by the young & the seasoned doctors. I thank the editorial team of the GOSI journal who has worked very hard & in sync to bring this landmark journal that will be the milestone created by GOSI, which will be released in GOSICON 2025 at the Chennai conference.

Initially, we will be planning to have at least one journal quarterly, that’s 4 journals in a year, and down the line, we will be having this indexed. I wish the GOSI team & the GOSI Editorial Journal team all the success.